My offererof advice, dissatisfied at my reception of him, quitted me, and I have never seen him since.
In this it was ordered, first, that the offerer should bring the victim himself.
There were sacrifices having a different special import, in which, while a part was burnt, the offerer might even himself join in eating the remaining part, taking that for his own use.
In so far as the offerer entered into this conception, and his inward experience corresponded to this outward rite, it was for him an act of worship.
Yet the offering must be delivered through the mediation of the priest; the offerer must not presume himself to lay it on the altar.
From the analogy of these cases we should expect to find evidence of an ideal transference of somewhat from the offerer to the victim here.
Lastly, the freewill-offerings were those which had no special occasion, but were merely the spontaneous expression of the love of the offerer to God, and his desire to live in friendship and fellowship with Him.
As in the case of the burnt-offering, the meal-offering also must be brought unto the Lord by the offerer himself.
In this, however, we must distinguish from the eating by the offerer and his household, the eating by the priests; of which only the first-named properly belonged to the ceremonial of the sacrifice.
Hence we may properly say that the fundamental thought of the ritual was this, that the victim should be killed by the offerer himself.
The offerer did not lose what he laid on the altar, but it came back to him, far more precious than before.
The restoration to the offerer of all which he lays on God's altar.
Consequently, when this is put into the hands of the agent the law regards the offerer as bound by his offer.
He looked at theofferer through the medium of the offering.
The contrast holds good whether we think of the offerer or the offering.
But in the sin-offering, when the offerer had laid his hand upon the head of the offering, it became a question of what the offerer was, and what he deserved; the offering was treated according to the deserts of the offerer.
By that significant act, the offerer and the offering became one; and this oneness, in the ease of the burnt-offering, secured for the offerer all the acceptableness of his offering.
The sin of the offerer was dealt with in the sin-offering; the person of the offerer was accepted in the burnt-offering.
The offering was treated as the offerer deserved; and hence, for him not to know that his sin was forgiven him, would have been to make God a liar, and to treat the blood of the divinely appointed sin-offering as nothing.
Gratified with such offerings they gratify the offerer in return with longevity and fame and wealth.
Both these, in consequence of the virtues of the offerer become inexhaustible.
Over every cake that is offered, the offerer should, with concentrated attention, utter the Savitri Mantras.
The person addressed, the "thou" of these chapters, which is either the individual Israelite or the whole community, has been held by some to indicate that the individual offerer was the only agent in sacrifice.
It is God who invites, for the house is His; His also is the gift, which must be brought to Him entire by the offerer before the altar, and the greater portion of which He gives up to His guests only affer that.
Upon the sacrifice human hands must be laid--the hands of the offerer and the hands of the priest.
So Philo: "God receives the faithful offerer to his own table, giving him back part of the sacrifice.
If the offerer were the high priest, the captain said, “My Lord, High Priest, offer the incense.
All must be pastured till they be blemished, and they must be sold, and the offerer must bring the price of the best of this kind and the price of the best of that kind, and the loss he must make up from his private means.
The offerer could not offer the incense, till the Captain said to him, “offer incense.
Every smoking sacrifice on the altar was supposed to come from an offerer drawing near to God in the sincere belief "that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that seek after him.
Those goods that the offerer has no right to give away or that are unsuitable on account of circumstances may never be given as offerings to God.
The sin-offering, as its name indicates, recognized the offerer as guilty and defiled, but obtaining forgiveness and cleansing through the death of the victim in his stead.
It was wholly the LORD'S; no part of it was eaten by the priest who offered it, nor by the offerer who presented it, it was all and only for GOD'S satisfaction.
As we read of the offerings of the twelve princes, we note that, valuable as they manifestly are, the offerer whose love prompted the gifts, is made more prominent in the inspired Record.
The existence of a written contract depends on the fact that the offerer and offeree have interchanged their written expressions, not on the continued existence of those expressions.
If it is necessary that the minds of the parties meet, there will be no contract until the acceptance can be read; none, for example, if the acceptance be snatched from the hand of the offerer by a third person.
Of course, an offerer by letter may withdraw his offer at any time.
By using the telegraph as an agency of communication, the offerer makes himself responsible for the offer actually delivered.
If the offerer understood the transaction to differ from that which his words plainly expressed, it is immaterial, "as his obligation must be measured by his overt acts.
The post-office is the agency of the offerer both to carry his offer and bring back the return.
Of course the telegraph company would be responsible to the offerer for any damage he may have suffered unless relieved by some neglect or fault of the sender of the message.
This offerer too cooled off and declined to pay, but he did not escape on the ground that this was only an explosion of affection, and was obliged to pay.
If the offeree should use a different agency, the telegraph for instance, to convey his acceptance, it would not be binding until the offerer had received and accepted it.
When this is done the other party must furnish some kind of consideration to make the offer good for anything, otherwise the offerer can withdraw his offer whenever he pleases.
He hath somewhat to offer," in the sense that He has for ever the grand sacerdotal qualification of being an Offerer who, having executed that function, now bears to all eternity its character.
It is His glory, and it is ours, that He is known by us as our one and all-sufficient Offerer and Mediator.
The offerer stands before the Power he approaches.
On the morrow of the Atonement Day he was as much an offerer as on the day itself.
With his forehead ceremonially marked with a touch of the blood lying thick upon the ground, the offerer leaves the temple, his sacrifice finished.
The decapitated body is carried off by the offerer to furnish his family with a holiday meal.
To one of these Glassdale, on arriving in the old city, promptly proceeded--selecting the offerer of the larger reward.
On his way he passed two places at which he was half inclined to call--one was the police-station; the other, the office of the solicitors who were acting on behalf of the offerer of five hundred pounds.
The above list will hopefully give you a few useful examples demonstrating the appropriate usage of "offerer" in a variety of sentences. We hope that you will now be able to make sentences using this word.
