The consanguine sisters, or the first, second and more remote cousins were wives in common with their husbands in common, who could not be their brothers.
Cunow does not see in the consanguine family the most primitive of all social forms, until now discovered.
Cunow, in his above named book, takes exception to Morgan's views that theconsanguine family, which rests on the organization of marriage classes by generations, preceded the punaluan family as an original organization.
According to Morgan, the consanguine family is supervened by a third and higher form of family relationship, which he designates as the Punaluan family.
These consanguine brothers, or cousins of several degrees, were the husbands in common of their wives in common, who could not be their sisters.
It shows plainly the rise of the consanguine groups.
The husbands of these women are not of the consanguine group, the gens, of their wives; they are of the gens of their sisters.
The consanguine family also prevailed at the time of Herodotus among the Massagetes.
Morgan assumes that from the state of general promiscuity, a higher form of sexual relation gradually developed, the consanguine family.
A new consanguine family, the gens, is evolved that originally consists of natural and remote sisters and their children, together with their natural or remote brothers on the mother's side.
It is an outgrowth of the consanguine family "through the gradual exclusion of own brothers and sisters from the marriage relation.
Thus consanguine marriage "found mankind at the bottom of the scale" of social progress.
Notwithstanding the high character of the evidence given, there is still other evidence of the ancient existence of the consanguine family among the Hawaiians which should not be overlooked.
Ascending to the time when the Malayan system of consanguinity was formed, and which preceded the gens, we find consanguine groups in the marriage relation.
Not less clearly was the monogamian family derived, by experience, through the syndyasmian from the punaluan, and the still more ancientconsanguine family.
The account must be explained as a classification of existing consanguine groups, according to the knowledge preserved by tradition, in doing which minor obstacles were overcome by legislative constraint.
In the second place, the consanguine family is stamped with the marks of this supposed antecedent state.
It gives the starting point of human society after mankind had emerged from a still lower condition and entered the organism of the consanguine family.
In the Malayan system, we find evidence of consanguine groups founded upon brother and sister marriages, but including collateral brothers and sisters in the group.
Communism in living must, of necessity, have prevailed both in the consanguineand in the punaluan family, because it was a requirement of their condition.
From this system the antecedent existence of the consanguine family, with the kind of marriage appertaining thereto, is plainly deducible.
In two forms of the family, the consanguine and punaluan, paternal power was impossible.
The existence of the Consanguine family must be proved by other evidence than the production of the family itself.
The evils of inbreeding are so probable as to justify strong prejudice against consanguine marriages.
It is and remains a fact, that it contains a long series of terms that cannot be explained by the relations in the so-called consanguine family, and the use of which creates confusion, if applied to this family.
Or the intercourse between parents and children was already proscribed by custom, when the classes were formed; and in this case the present condition points back to the consanguine family and is the first step out of it.
The Consanguine Family is the first step toward the family.
All three of them are groups of differentiated consanguine relations.
They inherited first together with the other consanguine relatives of the mother, later on perhaps in preference to the others.
In this or a similar manner that form which Morgan styles the Punaluan family developed from the consanguine family.
If the opponents of Morgan dispute that the so-called consanguine family is based on blood kinship, they are right, unless we wish to assign an exceptional position to the Australian strata of generations.
In this stage, the generic classification in strata of different ages belonging to the so-called consanguine family runs parallel for a while with the gentile order.
There is, if possible, a greater absence of historical testimony to the existence of the Consanguine family.
Morgan makes the systems of nomenclature proofs of the existence of the Consanguineand Punaluan families.
That discovery could only have been made after a long experience, and in the Consanguine family that experience was impossible.
Looking at facts, we find the Consanguine family nowhere, and cannot easily imagine how early groups abstained from infringing on each other, and created a systematic marriage of brothers and sisters.
Next, how did the Consanguine family change into the Punaluan?
Again, "the change of relationships which resulted from substituting Punaluan in the place of Consanguine marriage turns the Malayan into the Turanian system.
Thus, setting moral reform aside as inconceivable, we cannot understand how the Consanguine families ever broke up.
It is "essentially informing," because it is in line with coordinate and consanguine contentions which criminologists have dinned for long years into the public ear to no tangible purpose.
But if there is a full sister also, the full sister takes one-half, and the consanguine sisters one-sixth between them.
Consanguine half-sisters take a share of two-thirds, or if there is only one she takes a share of one-half.
Consanguine half-brothers are residuaries of the same class as brothers, but only take in default of full brothers.
That eminent clinical observer, the late Professor Trousseau, in treating of the influence of consanguine marriages, gives the history of a Neapolitan family, in which an uncle married his niece.
Different observers have furnished different results, as to the proportion of idiots found to be the offspring of consanguine marriages; thus Dr.
Much additional matter has been added, especially in reference to Consanguine Marriages, Parental Intemperance, Overpressure in Education, and other factors in the causation of Idiocy.
Since the husbands always belonged to a different consanguine group from their wives, and the children followed their mother's line of descent, the family was permanently divided.
Thus all law evolved, as we have said, would be purely with a view to regulation of the internal economy of a single consanguine group alone.
This is the usual hypothesis, and the sweeping scope of savage words for human relationships is accepted as proof that consanguine and group marriage once existed and left their marks in language.
Thus he writes, 'the presence of the offspring of the outside suitor in the formerly purelyconsanguine circle will be recognised.
On the other hand, they may incline to accept his theory that, as the Australian terms of relationship indicate often status, not relationship in our sense, they do not help to prove a past of consanguine and communal marriage.
He adds,[2] 'The Malayan system defines the relationship that would exist in a consanguine family, and it demands the existence of such a family to account for its own existence.
We have, it is true, no evidence of any such conditions among the anthropoids; but it must not be forgotten that we have no evidence of the consanguine family either among anthropoids, other mammals or human beings.
On the other hand, if, as Mr Lang supposes, the original group was a consanguine one, the claims of the factor of consanguinity and perhaps of foster brotherhood and motherhood cannot be neglected.
In the second place erroneous physiological ideas modify the ideas held as to actually existing consanguine relations, as we conceive them.
The above list will hopefully give you a few useful examples demonstrating the appropriate usage of "consanguine" in a variety of sentences. We hope that you will now be able to make sentences using this word.
