In all future conditions, some verb-form denoting future time is used in both clauses.
In a future condition which puts the supposed case rather vaguely, often with a considerable suggestion of doubt, a verb-phrase with should or would is used in both clauses.
Both clauses are +simple+, for each contains but one subject and one predicate.
The Psalmist expresses, as I have said, the same idea in both clauses.
The same tense need not necessarily stand in both clauses, e.
If in past time, a past indicative occurs in both clauses.
If a specific sequence is made in present time, then the present indicative stands in both clauses.
Subjunctive, both clauses: The uncertainty is emphasized by the auxiliary form; the chances of rain seem more remote.
Past subjunctive, both clauses: The speaker implies that it is not raining.
Past perfect subjunctive, both clauses: The speaker implies that it did not rain.
But it must have the same meaning in both clauses, and the form of the word shows that it must be construed in both with a following "of.
The ground of his plea for cleansing and deliverance is the glory of God's name, which he emphatically puts at the end of both clauses of ver.
Delitzsch recognises the necessity for giving the ambiguous word the same meaning in both clauses, and takes that meaning to be "creature," which suits well enough in a, but gives a very harsh meaning to b.
In both clauses of our text evil deeds done are regarded as having a strange, solemn life apart from the doer of them, by which they become influential factors in his subsequent life.
The repetition of the word in both clauses underscores, as it were, the remarkable concurrence.
If you leave them out, and suppose that the 'way of the Lord' is what is spoken of in both clauses, you get a far deeper and fuller meaning.
The above list will hopefully provide you with a few useful examples demonstrating the appropriate usage of "both clauses" in a variety of sentences. We hope that you will now be able to make sentences using this group of words.
