Especially in his theory of the vegetable soul, the essence of vitalism is already contained.
Mechanism is no more positive knowledge than vitalism is; it is only the dogmatic faith of the majority of present-day naturalists.
Driesch to cast off the bonds of dogmatic Darwinism and declare boldly for vitalism and teleology.
Materialistic methods of interpretation were upheld by perhaps the majority of biologists, but vitalismfound powerful support.
In the preceding chapters of biological philosophy we have sought to refute vitalism in every form, and to secure the exclusive acceptance of monism and mechanicism in every branch of the science of life.
Hence, in dealing with the evolution of organisms, we reject vitalism and dualism, and maintain our conviction that it can always be traced to physical forces (and especially chemical energy).
Hence it is strange to find that in the course of the last twenty years the old vitalism that everybody had thought dead has lifted up its head once more, though in a new and modified form.
In the same way Schleiden (1843) cut the ground from under vitalism in botany.
Teleology and Causality, or Vitalism and Mechanicism; VI.
The point at issue between vitalism and mechanism in biology is whether the living processes in nature can be resolved into a combination of the material.
But there is a scientific vitalism also, which it is well to distinguish from the metaphysical sort.
This vitalism is not a kind of biology more prudent and literal than the mechanical kind (as a scientific vitalism would be), but far less legitimately speculative.
Since the discovery of Evolution as the method of the Life Force the religion of metaphysical Vitalism has been gaining the definiteness and concreteness needed to make it assimilable by the educated critical man.
But even when it has discarded the psychoid we find vitalism still denying the possibility of mechanical explanation, still preaching the autonomy of the organism.
Frankly opposed to vitalism in all its forms is the conception of the living body as a mechanism.
This, of course, is vitalism, andvitalism in its extreme or ‘animistic’ form.
But before we pass to that criticism let us turn aside to examine some of the other aspects under which the Proteus of Vitalism presents himself.
Yet it is precisely this which modern or neo-vitalism has challenged and asks us to relinquish in favour of a theory of psychoids or a pseudo-metaphysical view of life.
He was a pupil of Barthez, but he placed his preceptor's vitalism far in the background.
Something like a new vitalism is making headway both on the Continent and in Great Britain.
Dr Haldane goes much further in the direction ofVitalism (discussion at British Association on the subject).
And vitalism will always rise up against rationalism; reason will always find itself confronted by will.
What connection is there between Bunge's Neo-Vitalism and Aniela?
But the position of vitalism is rendered very difficult by the fact that, in nature, there is neither purely internal finality nor absolutely distinct individuality.
This vitalism prevailed until about the middle of the nineteenth century.
At the beginning of the nineteenth century this vitalism was firmly established in France by Louis Dumas, and in Germany by Reil.
Lamarck himself is not very clear about this point, he seems to be afraid of certain types of uncritical vitalism in vogue in his days; but modern writers have most clearly seen what the logical assumptions of pure Lamarckism are.
In our next chapter again it will be space-relations, though analysed in a different manner, that will enable us to add a second real proof of vitalism to our first one.
Then you would recur to our first proof of vitalism and would burden entelechy with a specific performance, that is with the construction of the hypothetic machine which you are postulating in every single egg.
An historical sketch of vitalism will be found in my book, *Der Vitalismus als Geschichte und als Lehre*, Leipzig, 1905.
I cannot see an independent proof of vitalism in these facts if taken by themselves; a pre-existing “machine” cannot be absolutely excluded here.
But vitalism is regarded by him as dethroned for ever.
Next summer, however, we shall see that vitalism may be proved by such a correspondence if the two corresponding factors are not simple and not uniform.
We most clearly see at this point what it really was in our analysis of differentiation that allowed us to extract a real proof of vitalism from it.
It therefore is only with this postulate that our first proof of vitalism holds; but this restriction applies to *every* law of nature.
Vitalism then, or the autonomy of life, has been proved by us indirectly, and cannot be proved otherwise so long as we follow the lines of ordinary scientific reasoning.
It indeed has been the fault of all vitalism in the past that it rested on weak foundations.
Sir Oliver Lodge is, perhaps, the most uncompromising advocate of the newer vitalism in England.
There are also the catalysers of which we have spoken, with many problems associated with them, and throwing a possible and unexpected light on the vexed question of Vitalism and the Conservation of Energy.
One of the objections to Vitalism is that this explanation of living things is thought by ignorant writers to be so inextricably mixed up with theological considerations as to furnish a case of stantis aut cadentis ecclesiae.
The above list will hopefully give you a few useful examples demonstrating the appropriate usage of "vitalism" in a variety of sentences. We hope that you will now be able to make sentences using this word.
