Döllinger was expressing his surprise that Mr. Gladstone could possibly coquette in any way with the party that demanded the severance of Church and State in either Wales or Scotland.
Döllinger whilst that learned divine was discussing with him the question of Church and State.
It was Döllinger who trained Purkinje, Pander, Baer, and Agassiz, and such fame cannot be heightened by words of praise.
Baer’s account of Döllinger is to be found in the Leben und Schriften von K.
These words are still partly true, though it is not possible to make the assertion with so much confidence as when Döllinger wrote.
As has been proved by Döllinger in his work on the Reformation, and as was well seen even by earlier polemical writers, Luther’s statements concerning his own mission were not remarkable for consistency.
Döllinger says, “which, if meant seriously, would have thrown the whole new doctrine of justification into confusion.
As they stand, our last quotations from Döllinger merely constitute a part of the legend which grew up long since around the memory of the Wittenberg professor.
Nor is this view to be found among Protestants only, for Ignatius von Döllinger adopted it in later life, when he saw fit to abandon his previous position.
Döllinger says of such assurances as the above: “Such a tone of unshaken firmness was in Luther’s case largely due to the excitement caused by his polemics .
Döllinger to be presented to Madame di Frujberg, and her sister Amelia de Mongeras.
Döllinger promised to write articles to call to prayer for it.
Döllinger wished us all to go, but Phillipps thought it hardly proper without an invitation.
Many of his complaints concerning the morals of the time, as Döllinger remarks, sound very much like those of a “sworn Catholic criticising the state of affairs brought about by the Reformation.
Adrian went so far as to erect temples in his own honor, which, as Döllinger says, have been falsely supposed by some to have been places of Christian worship.
In Africa, as Alzog and Döllinger relate, the Christians soon outnumbered the pagans.
The Döllinger party are encouraged by some of the secular powers to attempt a new heresy.
It has magnified and misrepresented the Döllinger movement, and distorted, in the grossest manner, the story of the school question in Prussia.
One difference followed another in that country, and Döllinger was as interested in them as he could be in matters entirely personal to himself.
It would be hard for any one to be more subject to external influences than Döllinger is, and, at the same time, to be less conscious of their presence or effect.
Döllinger himself was evidently staggered at the unexpected impression of his, to say the least, unexplained appearance in such a character.
An accidental circumstance threw suspicion on Döllinger as the instigator of it.
Döllinger spoke with all the warmth of personal conviction.
But Döllinger has made that same beautiful book a sad memorial of his fall.
The question of the relations of science to church authority became now in Bavaria a practical question, and Döllinger was called upon to prove the strength of his principles by overt acts.
Döllinger had had many scholars during his long career as a professor; but he had founded no school.
We know very well that Döllinger was very far from desiring a schism when he spoke at the Linzer Catholic meeting in 1850, upon the subject of the place of German nationalism in the church.
Döllinger on the preparation of the ground for the Reformation.
Döllinger as president of the congress sent the pope a telegram which satisfied his holiness.
A telegraphic report to the pope drawn up in this spirit by Döllinger was responded to in a similar manner on the same day with the apostolic blessing.
On April 14th, Döllinger was excommunicated, and Professor Huber sent an exceedingly sharp reply to the archbishop.
Döllinger gave some modifying explanations at the autumn assembly of the Catholic Union at Munich in 1861.
After high mass, accompanied with the recitation of the Tridentine creed, the four days’ conference began with a brilliant presidential address by Döllinger “On the Past and Present of Catholic Theology.
The origin and gradual development of the legend, about the middle of the 12th century and certainly in Rome, may be most simply explained with Döllinger from a combination of the following data.
Döllinger was quite right when he wrote: “As a controversialist Luther combined undeniably dialectic and rhetorical talent with a degree of unscrupulousness such as is rarely met with in this domain.
Döllinger speaks of Luther as “a sympathetic friend, devoid of avarice and greed of money, and a willing helper of others.
Döllinger (as yet still a Catholic) says of him (“KL.
Thanks to his investigations Döllinger was able to write: “False interpretations of the most obvious and arbitrary kind are quite the usual thing in his polemics.
In teaching von Baer, Döllinger gave a direction to his studies which secured his future pre-eminence in the science of organic development.
I daresay you and I understand enough of mathematics between us to find out if there is anything serious in them, and if so, they shall go to Herr Döllinger at once.
It was signed by Professor Döllinger and endorsed by four of the greatest astronomers of Germany.
Döllinger made this the object of scathing criticism.
The King later was in the habit of asking Döllinger for information regarding religious works, and several times sent messengers to him to require his explanation of certain passages.
Döllinger is the greatest and wisest of men; he knows all things.
Döllinger which has been looked for as a probable event for many months past, has at length been made.
Döllinger have been thoroughly examined and discussed in a general council.
Döllinger and others of the same stamp took advantage of this toleration of an illogical and erroneous opinion to undermine the doctrine of Papal supremacy and the authority of œcumenical councils.
Döllinger and his partisans except submission to the decrees of the council, or to the anathema by which they were fortified.
Döllinger with the Archbishop of Munich consists in an appeal from the supreme authority in the church to the principle of private judgment.
Döllinger has gradually but surely approached and finally reached his present position of open, declared rebellion against the infallible authority of the Catholic Church.
Even this was not originated by Döllinger himself, but first planted in the mind of Maximilian II.
Döllinger himself, show themselves in their proper bearing; and among other things of this kind, the secret end and object of the famous scientific congress of Munich become perfectly manifest.
Döllinger at the Congress of Munich of the pre-eminence which Germany will gain in Catholic theology and sacred science will probably be in part fulfilled, though not in the sense which he had in his mind.
Döllinger reminds us, neither the Roman Diana nor the Grecian Artemis were connected in any way with the moon.
Döllinger describes the Ephesian goddess as "a kind of pantheistic deity, with more of an Asiatic than an Hellenic character.
After this declaration, if Döllinger still pretends that his friends in Holland are not Jansenists, he ought to maintain that neither Quesnel nor Jansenius ever were.
The above list will hopefully give you a few useful examples demonstrating the appropriate usage of "llinger" in a variety of sentences. We hope that you will now be able to make sentences using this word.
