The power of labour would in his case be in its least productive state.
In fact, if there were not that ultimate co-operation, the division oflabour would be not only less productive than labour without division, but it would not be productive at all.
Employers of clerk-labour would be indirectly benefited, and they would do well to assist in the promotion of any movement in the direction indicated.
Clerk-labour would seem to be frequently employed at the lowest possible price for which it can be procured.
With production scientifically and socially organised, the productivity of labour would be quintupled, and the amount of wealth would be increased in proportion.
Hours of labour would be fixed, and every citizen would take what he or she liked from the common stock.
Labour would be organised and occupation be changed every two hours.
The market of labour would then be free, and those obstacles removed which, as things are now, often for a considerable time prevent the price from rising according to the demand.
The fund appropriated to the maintenance of labour would be the aggregate quantity of food possessed by the owners of land beyond their own consumption.
That 'a reduction of the hours of labour would cause a corresponding reduction in the quantity produced' we entirely deny.
We do not say that a reduction in the hours of labour would do everything; but we are sure that little can be done without it.
With every worse quality employed, the value of the commodities in the manufacture of which they were used would rise, because equal quantities of labour would be less productive.
Such an argument illusory; for a community in which there was no labour would be impossible; but the paralysis of ability, or its practical non-existence possible.
This is the assumption that the official directors of labour would not be technical autocrats, but would be subject to the control of their brother officials, the statesmen, who represented the great mass of the people.
Under these very peculiar circumstances of higher money wages with a lower price of necessaries, the wages of labour would be in an unusual state, and would shortly revert to the old standard, when profits would feel the benefit.
Labour would be higher, because the labourer would require higher money wages when corn was doubled in price.
The above list will hopefully provide you with a few useful examples demonstrating the appropriate usage of "labour would" in a variety of sentences. We hope that you will now be able to make sentences using this group of words.
