This is his first form of argument:—“Movement has no truth, because what is in motion must first reach the middle of the space before arriving at the end.
Is it because what is generated does not yet exist, and because movement could not exist in non-being?
Know then, that every thing divided is more and more multiple, and not more and more simple; because what is continually divided approaches nearer and nearer to the infinite, in which all things are infinitely.
Mutable good is not considered to be a term in contraposition to the immutable good, unless one's end is fixed therein: because what is referred to the end has not the character of finality.
Now it is evident that a thing derives its species from that which is essential and not from that which is accidental: because what is accidental is outside the specific nature.
If not, it cannot make the action better or worse; because what is not good, cannot make a greater good; and what is not evil, cannot make a greater evil.
The first is that man should act "knowingly": and this is subject to the judgment of both Divine and human law; because what a man does in ignorance, he does accidentally.
I do so, because whatmay be called exaggeration is often the best means of bringing out certain faults of the mind which do indeed exist commonly, if not in that degree.
But, on the whole, he possessed a higher kind of knowledge than the Stoics, because what is thus founded cannot be held to have the significance of an implicit existence, but only a relative truth in consciousness.
We have first to remark that the name Aristotelian philosophy is most ambiguous, because what is called Aristotelian philosophy has at different times taken very different forms.
Yea, they have told me to my face, that I have used conjuration, and witchcraft, because what I preached was according to the scriptures.
Thus is it that the wisdom of the world is deemed foolish, because what is impossible to nature, it judges to be impossible to God.
Thirdly, because what is essential is prior to what is accidental.
As for those who object that "what all aim at is not necessarily good," I confess I cannot see much in what they say, because what all think we say is.
You did not send for me to tell me that," said Harley, with a certain protecting tenderness in his tone, because what he took to be the sadness in her face appealed to his manly qualities.
Hence he hesitated, because what he deemed to be the truth would have in it a sting for her.
Youth spoke to youth, and she did not stop him, because what he was saying to her was very pleasant, though it might be wrong.
In this particular instance we won't need a history-reversing gimmick at all, because what we'll see and hear is NOW.
He couldn't really help being what he was, because what is known as the bastard-pattern gets grooved into the poor unhappy devils who are afflicted with it way back in childhood.
Its relative excellence was undervalued, because what it could do was not quite to the point.
We do not require a like impartiality in the artist, because what he is to give is not Nature, but what Nature inspires.
She would say absolutely nothing about that affair with Katie, even though it was very dreadful, because what is to be forgiven must also be forgotten.
Tears were rising to her eyes from sheer perplexity, because what he said could not possibly have anything to do with the great test.
The above list will hopefully provide you with a few useful examples demonstrating the appropriate usage of "because what" in a variety of sentences. We hope that you will now be able to make sentences using this group of words.
